Hi Bookfoxers, At the age of eighteen, Django Reinhardt, a brilliant jazz guitarist, suffered severe burns to his left hand in a fire, rendering his third and fourth fingers unusable. Everyone said he'd never play guitar again. I mean, he only had three fingers on his left hand -- 40% of his musical possibilities were gone. But Django persisted. He worked with his shortcomings rather than against them. He figured out how to use the injured fingers for bar chords, and then use the good fingers to hold down specific strings. And in doing so, he came up with an usual musical style, a sound that belonged uniquely to him. His lack of fingers forced him to be original. Every writer has lost fingers. Basically, you have some kind of shortcoming that you have to work around to be great. Some writers are bad at writing dialogue, and they end up writing books light on dialogue, and their books have a specific texture that's unique.
Some writers are coming to English as a second language, and their lack of grammar and limited vocabulary guides them into a path of simpler prose -- giving them a specific voice.
Some writers struggle with concentration, or with orchestrating complex scenes, or with writing in short bursts while caring for children, and so end up writing a whole book in little snippets.
Your shortcomings are not problems, but invitations to develop a unique voice. Now if you don't have shortcomings (or don't know what they are) you can still take advantage of this advice. I'll tell you how, but first, a word from our sponsor:
To teach you how to use shortcomings to improve your book, we have to look at a French group of writers in the mid 20th century. A group of French-speaking writers, led by the poet Raymond Queneau, decided to artificially limit their writing styles. They called themselves "Oulipo". They hadn't suffered the loss of two fingers, but instead they took on artificial limits that forced them to be creative. Some of their exercises were wild (like not writing with the letter E). I won't ask you to do that (it's really hard). But you could try one of these exercises as a way to force you out of creative grooves and into new territory:
Another benefit of the Oulipo technique is that it cures writers block. Somehow when you put up road blocks for your writing, it allows you to be creative, but when there are zero restrictions, it's a struggle to face the infinite possibilities. Maybe you already know what your missing two fingers are. Or maybe you can just pretend to be missing two fingers. Either way, the limitations will force you into new and original territory. Best, John PS. Check out my latest Youtube video, "Huge Lies Writing Gurus are Telling You" |
John Matthew Fox helps authors write better fiction. He is the founder of Bookfox, where he creates online courses for writers, provides editing and offers publishing assistance. He is the author of "The Linchpin Writer: Crafting Your Novel's Key Moments" and “I Will Shout Your Name,” a collection of short stories.
Hi Bookfoxers, Debra Sparks, in her craft book "And Then Something Happens" talks about the benefits of the Crosscut Technique. She's really talking about how to create suspense in your book, and notices that all these books and television shows kept on doing the same thing: jumping to a new storyline. Why? What's the point of leaving a story we're invested in, just to make the reader step into a new piece of the story with different characters? Well, that's the magic of a crosscut. A...
Hi Bookfoxers, Most writers can't answer these five basic questions. But any writer who can has a much higher chance of finding success. Here they are: 1. Why am I writing? Orwell said a common reason why writers write is "sheer egotism." They want their name known, they want the next generation to remember them. Some authors write for therapeutic reasons, to work out a particular psychological problem. Other authors just want to help others: they write out of altruism. Name your WHY. It will...
Hi Bookfoxers, Rudolf Flesch, an Austrian who hid from the Nazis in WW II, wondered why English sentences were so difficult to read. He thought writing should be simple, but that most people cluttered it up needlessly with complex language. So he gave two pieces of advice: keep your sentences short (he thought the golden mean was 17 words) use short words (longer words decrease comprehension) And Flesch invented a formula that calculated words and syllables in sentences, and assigned a score...